Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/19th Century Arguments for Anti-Vivisection found in The Island of Dr. Moreau
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:46, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- 19th Century Arguments for Anti-Vivisection found in The Island of Dr. Moreau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Original research. This article represents the author's interpretation of plot elements of the novel The Island of Doctor Moreau, with no indication that such interpretation is drawn from any reliable source. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wow. This really reads like an essay and quite WP:SYNful. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 17:53, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:OR, Essay, POV, etc. Since I believe that all good WP articles are SYN I shan't specially accuse it of that, though it certainly is. Totally unencyclopedic, unrescuable. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per all above JayJayWhat did I do? 00:01, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research. If other (published) authors have discussed the connection, some material could be added to the article on the book. But unfortunately, without references to such discussions, it's WP:OR, being an original synthesis of material. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:48, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agreed with above, POV. London prophet (talk) 13:07, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, school essay. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow delete as an essay. AutomaticStrikeout (T • C) 15:38, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.